Skip to content

Open Graph vs Workable

Based on 3463 and 7 real audits

View Open Graph details | View Workable details
MetricOpen GraphWorkableWinner
Performance4560Workable
Accessibility8990Workable
Best Practices8792Workable
SEO9293Workable
Security6765Open Graph
TTFB368ms147msWorkable
Composite7475Workable
Performance
Open Graph
45
Workable
60
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
Workable
90
Security
Open Graph
67
Workable
65
SEO
Open Graph
92
Workable
93
Composite
Open Graph
74
Workable
75

Workable outperforms Open Graph in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Open Graph leads in security.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Workable

Choose Workable when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3463 audited Open Graph sites and 7 audited Workable sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or Workable?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Workable sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or Workable?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or Workable?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Workable (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or Workable?
Workable sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or Workable?
Workable sites show lower Time to First Byte (147 ms vs 368 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or Workable for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Workable scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback