Skip to content

Open Graph vs X-Clacks-Overhead

Based on 3811 and 19 real audits

View Open Graph details | View X-Clacks-Overhead details
MetricOpen GraphX-Clacks-OverheadWinner
Performance4748X-Clacks-Overhead
Accessibility8988Open Graph
Best Practices8885Open Graph
SEO9288Open Graph
Security6871X-Clacks-Overhead
TTFB381ms322msX-Clacks-Overhead
Composite7576X-Clacks-Overhead
Performance
Open Graph
47
X-Clacks-Overhead
48
Accessibility
Open Graph
89
X-Clacks-Overhead
88
Security
Open Graph
68
X-Clacks-Overhead
71
SEO
Open Graph
92
X-Clacks-Overhead
88
Composite
Open Graph
75
X-Clacks-Overhead
76

X-Clacks-Overhead outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Open Graph leads in accessibility, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose X-Clacks-Overhead

Choose X-Clacks-Overhead when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3811 audited Open Graph sites and 19 audited X-Clacks-Overhead sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, X-Clacks-Overhead sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead?
X-Clacks-Overhead sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead?
X-Clacks-Overhead sites show lower Time to First Byte (322 ms vs 381 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Open Graph or X-Clacks-Overhead for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. X-Clacks-Overhead scores higher on overall composite score while Open Graph may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback