| Metric | Open Graph | Zone.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 33 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Zone.js |
| Best Practices | 87 | 92 | Zone.js |
| SEO | 92 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Security | 66 | 67 | Zone.js |
| TTFB | 358ms | 302ms | Zone.js |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Open Graph |
Zone.js outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Open Graph leads in performance, SEO, composite score.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zone.js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3360 audited Open Graph sites and 46 audited Zone.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback