Based on 3359 and 93 real audits
| Metric | Open Graph | ZURB Foundation | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 38 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Open Graph |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 358ms | 375ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms ZURB Foundation in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). ZURB Foundation leads in no categories.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
ZURB Foundation doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 3359 audited Open Graph sites and 93 audited ZURB Foundation sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback