| Metric | OpenSSL | PHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 46 | PHP |
| Accessibility | 86 | 89 | PHP |
| Best Practices | 85 | 88 | PHP |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | PHP |
| Security | 64 | 65 | PHP |
| TTFB | 524ms | 421ms | PHP |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | PHP |
PHP outperforms OpenSSL in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). OpenSSL leads in no categories.
OpenSSL doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 45 audited OpenSSL sites and 1030 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback