| Metric | OpenX | Prebid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 33 | Prebid |
| Accessibility | 85 | 87 | Prebid |
| Best Practices | 76 | 81 | Prebid |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 341ms | 266ms | Prebid |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Prebid |
Prebid outperforms OpenX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). OpenX leads in no categories.
OpenX doesn't clearly lead Prebid in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 51 audited OpenX sites and 321 audited Prebid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback