Based on 3 and 91 real audits
| Metric | Optimization Detective | Site Kit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 51 | Site Kit |
| Accessibility | 93 | 89 | Optimization Detective |
| Best Practices | 87 | 91 | Site Kit |
| SEO | 94 | 93 | Optimization Detective |
| Security | 73 | 73 | Tie |
| TTFB | 3020ms | 723ms | Site Kit |
| Composite | 78 | 79 | Site Kit |
Site Kit outperforms Optimization Detective in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 78). Optimization Detective leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Optimization Detective when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Site Kit when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Optimization Detective sites and 91 audited Site Kit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback