Based on 59 and 1 real audits
| Metric | OWL Carousel | PageLayer | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 50 | PageLayer |
| Accessibility | 83 | 88 | PageLayer |
| Best Practices | 86 | 100 | PageLayer |
| SEO | 88 | 92 | PageLayer |
| Security | 64 | 60 | OWL Carousel |
| TTFB | 391ms | 48ms | PageLayer |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | PageLayer |
PageLayer outperforms OWL Carousel in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). OWL Carousel leads in security.
Choose OWL Carousel when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose PageLayer when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 59 audited OWL Carousel sites and 1 audited PageLayer sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback