Based on 12 and 23 real audits
| Metric | Paraglide JS | SvelteKit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 66 | 64 | Paraglide JS |
| Accessibility | 95 | 94 | Paraglide JS |
| Best Practices | 95 | 95 | Tie |
| SEO | 98 | 97 | Paraglide JS |
| Security | 84 | 75 | Paraglide JS |
| TTFB | 255ms | 395ms | Paraglide JS |
| Composite | 85 | 80 | Paraglide JS |
Paraglide JS outperforms SvelteKit in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 80). SvelteKit leads in no categories.
Choose Paraglide JS when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
SvelteKit doesn't clearly lead Paraglide JS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 12 audited Paraglide JS sites and 23 audited SvelteKit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback