| Metric | PerimeterX | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 38 | React |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | PerimeterX |
| Best Practices | 80 | 87 | React |
| SEO | 95 | 93 | PerimeterX |
| Security | 65 | 67 | React |
| TTFB | 189ms | 332ms | PerimeterX |
| Composite | 71 | 74 | React |
React outperforms PerimeterX in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). PerimeterX leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose PerimeterX when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 22 audited PerimeterX sites and 1021 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback