Based on 69 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Permutive | Sourcepoint | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 28 | Permutive |
| Accessibility | 87 | 75 | Permutive |
| Best Practices | 82 | 77 | Permutive |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Permutive |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Sourcepoint |
| TTFB | 232ms | 152ms | Sourcepoint |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Permutive |
Permutive outperforms Sourcepoint in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Sourcepoint leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Permutive when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sourcepoint when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 69 audited Permutive sites and 2 audited Sourcepoint sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback