Based on 1061 and 1 real audits
| Metric | PHP | Simple Machines Forum | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 100 | Simple Machines Forum |
| Accessibility | 89 | 55 | PHP |
| Best Practices | 88 | 92 | Simple Machines Forum |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | Simple Machines Forum |
| Security | 66 | 72 | Simple Machines Forum |
| TTFB | 430ms | 339ms | Simple Machines Forum |
| Composite | 74 | 79 | Simple Machines Forum |
Simple Machines Forum outperforms PHP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). PHP leads in accessibility.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Simple Machines Forum when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1061 audited PHP sites and 1 audited Simple Machines Forum sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback