Based on 1030 and 6 real audits
| Metric | PHP | Very Good Security | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 33 | PHP |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | Very Good Security |
| Best Practices | 88 | 77 | PHP |
| SEO | 91 | 89 | PHP |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Very Good Security |
| TTFB | 421ms | 331ms | Very Good Security |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
PHP and Very Good Security are closely matched, each leading in different categories. PHP has a composite score of 74 while Very Good Security scores 74.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Very Good Security when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1030 audited PHP sites and 6 audited Very Good Security sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback