| Metric | PHP | WP-PageNavi | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 33 | PHP |
| Accessibility | 89 | 85 | PHP |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | PHP |
| SEO | 91 | 87 | PHP |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 381ms | 278ms | WP-PageNavi |
| Composite | 74 | 71 | PHP |
PHP outperforms WP-PageNavi in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). WP-PageNavi leads in TTFB.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose WP-PageNavi when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 948 audited PHP sites and 8 audited WP-PageNavi sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback