Skip to content

PHP vs wpBakery

Based on 1435 and 25 real audits

View PHP details | View wpBakery details
MetricPHPwpBakeryWinner
Performance5037PHP
Accessibility8886PHP
Best Practices8986PHP
SEO9191Tie
Security6968PHP
TTFB613ms1009msPHP
Composite7676Tie
Performance
PHP
50
wpBakery
37
Accessibility
PHP
88
wpBakery
86
Security
PHP
69
wpBakery
68
SEO
PHP
91
wpBakery
91
Composite
PHP
76
wpBakery
76

PHP outperforms wpBakery in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). wpBakery leads in no categories.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose wpBakery

wpBakery doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1435 audited PHP sites and 25 audited wpBakery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, PHP or wpBakery?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, PHP or wpBakery?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (613 ms vs 1009 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose PHP or wpBakery for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while PHP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback