Skip to content

PHP vs wpBakery

Based on 948 and 13 real audits

MetricPHPwpBakeryWinner
Performance4639PHP
Accessibility8987PHP
Best Practices8779PHP
SEO9190PHP
Security6462PHP
TTFB381ms567msPHP
Composite7473PHP
Performance
PHP
46
wpBakery
39
Accessibility
PHP
89
wpBakery
87
Security
PHP
64
wpBakery
62
SEO
PHP
91
wpBakery
90
Composite
PHP
74
wpBakery
73

PHP outperforms wpBakery in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). wpBakery leads in no categories.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose wpBakery

wpBakery doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 948 audited PHP sites and 13 audited wpBakery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, PHP or wpBakery?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, PHP or wpBakery?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), PHP or wpBakery?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (381 ms vs 567 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose PHP or wpBakery for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while PHP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback