Based on 35 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Plausible Analytics | Tablesorter | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 57 | Tablesorter |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 90 | 93 | Tablesorter |
| SEO | 93 | 86 | Plausible Analytics |
| Security | 63 | 61 | Plausible Analytics |
| TTFB | 185ms | 228ms | Plausible Analytics |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Plausible Analytics |
Plausible Analytics outperforms Tablesorter in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Tablesorter leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Plausible Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tablesorter when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 35 audited Plausible Analytics sites and 4 audited Tablesorter sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback