Based on 66 and 36 real audits
| Metric | Plausible | Plausible Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 56 | Plausible |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 90 | Plausible |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Plausible |
| TTFB | 202ms | 185ms | Plausible Analytics |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | Plausible |
Plausible outperforms Plausible Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Plausible Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose Plausible when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Plausible Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 66 audited Plausible sites and 36 audited Plausible Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback