Based on 7 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Polylang | Twenty Eleven | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 55 | 64 | Twenty Eleven |
| Accessibility | 83 | 85 | Twenty Eleven |
| Best Practices | 92 | 96 | Twenty Eleven |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Polylang |
| Security | 75 | 76 | Twenty Eleven |
| TTFB | 659ms | 444ms | Twenty Eleven |
| Composite | 80 | 80 | Tie |
Twenty Eleven outperforms Polylang in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 80). Polylang leads in SEO.
Choose Polylang when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Eleven when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Polylang sites and 1 audited Twenty Eleven sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback