| Metric | Prebid | Unruly | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 41 | Unruly |
| Accessibility | 87 | 86 | Prebid |
| Best Practices | 81 | 81 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 100 | Unruly |
| Security | 64 | 62 | Prebid |
| TTFB | 266ms | 443ms | Prebid |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Prebid outperforms Unruly in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Unruly leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Unruly when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 315 audited Prebid sites and 1 audited Unruly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback