| Metric | Prefix-Free | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 43 | React |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Prefix-Free |
| Best Practices | 91 | 88 | Prefix-Free |
| SEO | 89 | 93 | React |
| Security | 65 | 70 | React |
| TTFB | 204ms | 406ms | Prefix-Free |
| Composite | 72 | 76 | React |
React outperforms Prefix-Free in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). Prefix-Free leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Prefix-Free when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Prefix-Free sites and 1230 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback