Based on 1698 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Priority Hints | Supabase | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 60 | Supabase |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 88 | 92 | Supabase |
| SEO | 92 | 100 | Supabase |
| Security | 68 | 69 | Supabase |
| TTFB | 348ms | 492ms | Priority Hints |
| Composite | 75 | 80 | Supabase |
Supabase outperforms Priority Hints in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 75). Priority Hints leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Supabase when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1698 audited Priority Hints sites and 3 audited Supabase sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback