Based on 1579 and 4 real audits
| Metric | Priority Hints | Tilda | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 64 | Tilda |
| Accessibility | 90 | 84 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Tilda |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | Tilda |
| Security | 67 | 61 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 319ms | 217ms | Tilda |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Priority Hints |
Tilda outperforms Priority Hints in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Priority Hints leads in accessibility, security, composite score.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tilda when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1579 audited Priority Hints sites and 4 audited Tilda sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback