Based on 1533 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Priority Hints | Twenty Seventeen | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 81 | Twenty Seventeen |
| Accessibility | 90 | 96 | Twenty Seventeen |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Twenty Seventeen |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 83 | Twenty Seventeen |
| TTFB | 310ms | 797ms | Priority Hints |
| Composite | 74 | 85 | Twenty Seventeen |
Twenty Seventeen outperforms Priority Hints in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 74). Priority Hints leads in TTFB.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Twenty Seventeen when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1533 audited Priority Hints sites and 1 audited Twenty Seventeen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback