Based on 1579 and 41 real audits
| Metric | Priority Hints | Typekit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 42 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 87 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Priority Hints |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Priority Hints |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 319ms | 320ms | Priority Hints |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Priority Hints |
Priority Hints outperforms Typekit in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Typekit leads in no categories.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Typekit doesn't clearly lead Priority Hints in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1579 audited Priority Hints sites and 41 audited Typekit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback