Based on 2013 and 52 real audits
| Metric | Priority Hints | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 46 | Priority Hints |
| Accessibility | 90 | 73 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 89 | 87 | Priority Hints |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Priority Hints |
| Security | 71 | 65 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 392ms | 417ms | Priority Hints |
| Composite | 77 | 72 | Priority Hints |
Priority Hints outperforms Yandex.Metrika in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 72). Yandex.Metrika leads in no categories.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Yandex.Metrika doesn't clearly lead Priority Hints in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2013 audited Priority Hints sites and 52 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback