Skip to content

PubMatic vs PushWoosh

Based on 47 and 1 real audits

MetricPubMaticPushWooshWinner
Performance3240PushWoosh
Accessibility8394PushWoosh
Best Practices7569PubMatic
SEO91100PushWoosh
Security6465PushWoosh
TTFB295ms22msPushWoosh
Composite7071PushWoosh
Performance
PubMatic
32
PushWoosh
40
Accessibility
PubMatic
83
PushWoosh
94
Security
PubMatic
64
PushWoosh
65
SEO
PubMatic
91
PushWoosh
100
Composite
PubMatic
70
PushWoosh
71

PushWoosh outperforms PubMatic in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). PubMatic leads in best practices.

When to choose PubMatic

Choose PubMatic when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PushWoosh

Choose PushWoosh when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 47 audited PubMatic sites and 1 audited PushWoosh sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, PubMatic or PushWoosh?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PushWoosh sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, PubMatic or PushWoosh?
PushWoosh sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, PubMatic or PushWoosh?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PushWoosh (94 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, PubMatic or PushWoosh?
PushWoosh sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), PubMatic or PushWoosh?
PushWoosh sites show lower Time to First Byte (22 ms vs 295 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose PubMatic or PushWoosh for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PushWoosh scores higher on overall composite score while PubMatic may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback