| Metric | Quill | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 44 | React |
| Accessibility | 76 | 90 | React |
| Best Practices | 92 | 89 | Quill |
| SEO | 87 | 93 | React |
| Security | 71 | 70 | Quill |
| TTFB | 409ms | 437ms | Quill |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | React |
React outperforms Quill in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Quill leads in best practices, security, TTFB.
Choose Quill when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 13 audited Quill sites and 1286 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback