| Metric | Radix UI | Render | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 64 | Render |
| Accessibility | 93 | 90 | Radix UI |
| Best Practices | 92 | 94 | Render |
| SEO | 96 | 95 | Radix UI |
| Security | 75 | 73 | Radix UI |
| TTFB | 541ms | 337ms | Render |
| Composite | 80 | 79 | Radix UI |
Radix UI outperforms Render in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 79). Render leads in performance, best practices, TTFB.
Choose Radix UI when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Render when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 152 audited Radix UI sites and 5 audited Render sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback