| Metric | RankMath SEO | Zakra | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 75 | Zakra |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | RankMath SEO |
| Best Practices | 87 | 100 | Zakra |
| SEO | 93 | 100 | Zakra |
| Security | 67 | 64 | RankMath SEO |
| TTFB | 547ms | 625ms | RankMath SEO |
| Composite | 76 | 81 | Zakra |
Zakra outperforms RankMath SEO in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 76). RankMath SEO leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose RankMath SEO when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zakra when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 33 audited RankMath SEO sites and 1 audited Zakra sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback