Based on 1 and 155 real audits
| Metric | Razorpay | React Router | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 8 | 41 | React Router |
| Accessibility | 80 | 91 | React Router |
| Best Practices | 100 | 87 | Razorpay |
| SEO | 91 | 94 | React Router |
| Security | 78 | 70 | Razorpay |
| TTFB | 78ms | 307ms | Razorpay |
| Composite | 78 | 76 | Razorpay |
Razorpay outperforms React Router in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). React Router leads in performance, accessibility, SEO.
Choose Razorpay when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React Router when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Razorpay sites and 155 audited React Router sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback