Based on 14 and 955 real audits
| Metric | React Native for Web | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 38 | Webpack |
| Accessibility | 82 | 89 | Webpack |
| Best Practices | 95 | 87 | React Native for Web |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Webpack |
| Security | 67 | 66 | React Native for Web |
| TTFB | 687ms | 304ms | Webpack |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Webpack |
Webpack outperforms React Native for Web in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). React Native for Web leads in best practices, security.
Choose React Native for Web when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webpack when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited React Native for Web sites and 955 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback