| Metric | React | Render | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 64 | Render |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Render |
| Best Practices | 87 | 94 | Render |
| SEO | 93 | 95 | Render |
| Security | 67 | 73 | Render |
| TTFB | 352ms | 337ms | Render |
| Composite | 74 | 79 | Render |
Render outperforms React in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). React leads in no categories.
React doesn't clearly lead Render in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Render when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1081 audited React sites and 5 audited Render sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback