Based on 1039 and 2 real audits
| Metric | React | Request Metrics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 44 | Request Metrics |
| Accessibility | 89 | 86 | React |
| Best Practices | 87 | 84 | React |
| SEO | 93 | 96 | Request Metrics |
| Security | 67 | 60 | React |
| TTFB | 342ms | 201ms | Request Metrics |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | React |
React outperforms Request Metrics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Request Metrics leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose React when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Request Metrics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1039 audited React sites and 2 audited Request Metrics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback