Based on 1002 and 167 real audits
| Metric | React | styled-components | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 33 | React |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 85 | React |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 66 | 65 | React |
| TTFB | 322ms | 315ms | styled-components |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | React |
React outperforms styled-components in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). styled-components leads in TTFB.
Choose React when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose styled-components when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1002 audited React sites and 167 audited styled-components sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback