| Metric | React | Three.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 33 | React |
| Accessibility | 89 | 93 | Three.js |
| Best Practices | 87 | 90 | Three.js |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 71 | Three.js |
| TTFB | 332ms | 377ms | React |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Three.js |
Three.js outperforms React in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). React leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Three.js when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1021 audited React sites and 35 audited Three.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback