| Metric | React | Turbopack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 44 | Turbopack |
| Accessibility | 89 | 91 | Turbopack |
| Best Practices | 87 | 89 | Turbopack |
| SEO | 93 | 94 | Turbopack |
| Security | 66 | 69 | Turbopack |
| TTFB | 322ms | 296ms | Turbopack |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Turbopack |
Turbopack outperforms React in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). React leads in no categories.
React doesn't clearly lead Turbopack in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Turbopack when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1000 audited React sites and 114 audited Turbopack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback