Skip to content

Recurly vs StackAdapt

Based on 1 and 54 real audits

View Recurly details | View StackAdapt details
MetricRecurlyStackAdaptWinner
Performance629StackAdapt
Accessibility8490StackAdapt
Best Practices8178Recurly
SEO7591StackAdapt
Security6064StackAdapt
TTFB69ms340msRecurly
Composite7172StackAdapt
Performance
Recurly
6
StackAdapt
29
Accessibility
Recurly
84
StackAdapt
90
Security
Recurly
60
StackAdapt
64
SEO
Recurly
75
StackAdapt
91
Composite
Recurly
71
StackAdapt
72

StackAdapt outperforms Recurly in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Recurly leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Recurly

Choose Recurly when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose StackAdapt

Choose StackAdapt when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Recurly sites and 54 audited StackAdapt sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Recurly or StackAdapt?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, StackAdapt sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (29 vs 6 on average).
Which has better security, Recurly or StackAdapt?
StackAdapt sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Recurly or StackAdapt?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor StackAdapt (90 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Recurly or StackAdapt?
StackAdapt sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 75 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Recurly or StackAdapt?
Recurly sites show lower Time to First Byte (69 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Recurly or StackAdapt for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. StackAdapt scores higher on overall composite score while Recurly may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback