| Metric | Scrivito | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 38 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Scrivito |
| Best Practices | 77 | 87 | Webpack |
| SEO | 100 | 92 | Scrivito |
| Security | 55 | 66 | Webpack |
| TTFB | 126ms | 308ms | Scrivito |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Webpack |
Scrivito and Webpack are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Scrivito has a composite score of 71 while Webpack scores 73.
Choose Scrivito when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webpack when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Scrivito sites and 972 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback