Based on 2 and 85 real audits
| Metric | Securiti | Vercel Edge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 52 | Vercel Edge |
| Accessibility | 93 | 92 | Securiti |
| Best Practices | 75 | 91 | Vercel Edge |
| SEO | 84 | 94 | Vercel Edge |
| Security | 66 | 70 | Vercel Edge |
| TTFB | 369ms | 395ms | Securiti |
| Composite | 71 | 76 | Vercel Edge |
Vercel Edge outperforms Securiti in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 71). Securiti leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Securiti when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vercel Edge when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Securiti sites and 85 audited Vercel Edge sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback