| Metric | Select2 | Tablesorter | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 57 | Tablesorter |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 87 | 93 | Tablesorter |
| SEO | 90 | 86 | Select2 |
| Security | 63 | 61 | Select2 |
| TTFB | 495ms | 228ms | Tablesorter |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Tablesorter |
Tablesorter outperforms Select2 in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Select2 leads in SEO, security.
Choose Select2 when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tablesorter when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 61 audited Select2 sites and 4 audited Tablesorter sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback