Skip to content

ShinyStat vs Ubuntu

Based on 1 and 72 real audits

View ShinyStat details | View Ubuntu details
MetricShinyStatUbuntuWinner
Performance5955ShinyStat
Accessibility9785ShinyStat
Best Practices8890Ubuntu
SEO10090ShinyStat
Security8065ShinyStat
TTFB90ms457msShinyStat
Composite8274ShinyStat
Performance
ShinyStat
59
Ubuntu
55
Accessibility
ShinyStat
97
Ubuntu
85
Security
ShinyStat
80
Ubuntu
65
SEO
ShinyStat
100
Ubuntu
90
Composite
ShinyStat
82
Ubuntu
74

ShinyStat outperforms Ubuntu in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 74). Ubuntu leads in best practices.

When to choose ShinyStat

Choose ShinyStat when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Ubuntu

Choose Ubuntu when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited ShinyStat sites and 72 audited Ubuntu sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ShinyStat or Ubuntu?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, ShinyStat sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 55 on average).
Which has better security, ShinyStat or Ubuntu?
ShinyStat sites score higher on security analysis (80 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ShinyStat or Ubuntu?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor ShinyStat (97 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ShinyStat or Ubuntu?
ShinyStat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ShinyStat or Ubuntu?
ShinyStat sites show lower Time to First Byte (90 ms vs 457 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ShinyStat or Ubuntu for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. ShinyStat scores higher on overall composite score while ShinyStat may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback