Based on 45 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Shop Pay | ShoppingGives | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 22 | Shop Pay |
| Accessibility | 87 | 92 | ShoppingGives |
| Best Practices | 81 | 79 | Shop Pay |
| SEO | 92 | 88 | Shop Pay |
| Security | 72 | 68 | Shop Pay |
| TTFB | 226ms | 312ms | Shop Pay |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Shop Pay |
Shop Pay outperforms ShoppingGives in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). ShoppingGives leads in accessibility.
Choose Shop Pay when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose ShoppingGives when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 45 audited Shop Pay sites and 2 audited ShoppingGives sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback