| Metric | Shop Pay | Signifyd | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 26 | Shop Pay |
| Accessibility | 90 | 83 | Shop Pay |
| Best Practices | 88 | 76 | Shop Pay |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 77 | 73 | Shop Pay |
| TTFB | 372ms | 378ms | Shop Pay |
| Composite | 79 | 74 | Shop Pay |
Shop Pay outperforms Signifyd in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). Signifyd leads in no categories.
Choose Shop Pay when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Signifyd doesn't clearly lead Shop Pay in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 155 audited Shop Pay sites and 4 audited Signifyd sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback