Skip to content

SmartRecruiters vs unpkg

Based on 2 and 158 real audits

View SmartRecruiters details | View unpkg details
MetricSmartRecruitersunpkgWinner
Performance2538unpkg
Accessibility8589unpkg
Best Practices7584unpkg
SEO8590unpkg
Security7266SmartRecruiters
TTFB158ms353msSmartRecruiters
Composite7273unpkg
Performance
SmartRecruiters
25
unpkg
38
Accessibility
SmartRecruiters
85
unpkg
89
Security
SmartRecruiters
72
unpkg
66
SEO
SmartRecruiters
85
unpkg
90
Composite
SmartRecruiters
72
unpkg
73

unpkg outperforms SmartRecruiters in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). SmartRecruiters leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose SmartRecruiters

Choose SmartRecruiters when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose unpkg

Choose unpkg when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited SmartRecruiters sites and 158 audited unpkg sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, SmartRecruiters or unpkg?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, unpkg sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, SmartRecruiters or unpkg?
SmartRecruiters sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, SmartRecruiters or unpkg?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor unpkg (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, SmartRecruiters or unpkg?
unpkg sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), SmartRecruiters or unpkg?
SmartRecruiters sites show lower Time to First Byte (158 ms vs 353 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose SmartRecruiters or unpkg for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. unpkg scores higher on overall composite score while SmartRecruiters may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback