Based on 3 and 45 real audits
| Metric | SockJS | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 45 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Accessibility | 72 | 72 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 75 | 87 | Yandex.Metrika |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 63 | Tie |
| TTFB | 243ms | 379ms | SockJS |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Yandex.Metrika outperforms SockJS in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). SockJS leads in TTFB.
Choose SockJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited SockJS sites and 45 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback