Based on 3 and 47 real audits
| Metric | SockJS | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 45 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Accessibility | 72 | 72 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 75 | 87 | Yandex.Metrika |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | SockJS |
| Security | 63 | 63 | Tie |
| TTFB | 243ms | 390ms | SockJS |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
SockJS and Yandex.Metrika are closely matched, each leading in different categories. SockJS has a composite score of 71 while Yandex.Metrika scores 71.
Choose SockJS when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited SockJS sites and 47 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback