Skip to content

Squarespace vs Typekit

Based on 22 and 56 real audits

View Squarespace details | View Typekit details
MetricSquarespaceTypekitWinner
Performance3541Typekit
Accessibility9388Squarespace
Best Practices9688Squarespace
SEO9692Squarespace
Security7370Squarespace
TTFB262ms291msSquarespace
Composite7674Squarespace
Performance
Squarespace
35
Typekit
41
Accessibility
Squarespace
93
Typekit
88
Security
Squarespace
73
Typekit
70
SEO
Squarespace
96
Typekit
92
Composite
Squarespace
76
Typekit
74

Squarespace outperforms Typekit in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Typekit leads in performance.

When to choose Squarespace

Choose Squarespace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Typekit

Choose Typekit when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 22 audited Squarespace sites and 56 audited Typekit sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Squarespace or Typekit?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Typekit sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Squarespace or Typekit?
Squarespace sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Squarespace or Typekit?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Squarespace (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Squarespace or Typekit?
Squarespace sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Squarespace or Typekit?
Squarespace sites show lower Time to First Byte (262 ms vs 291 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Squarespace or Typekit for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Typekit scores higher on overall composite score while Squarespace may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback