Based on 15 and 74 real audits
| Metric | Squarespace | TypeScript | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 35 | Squarespace |
| Accessibility | 94 | 90 | Squarespace |
| Best Practices | 97 | 91 | Squarespace |
| SEO | 94 | 90 | Squarespace |
| Security | 71 | 67 | Squarespace |
| TTFB | 303ms | 327ms | Squarespace |
| Composite | 76 | 73 | Squarespace |
Squarespace outperforms TypeScript in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). TypeScript leads in no categories.
Choose Squarespace when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
TypeScript doesn't clearly lead Squarespace in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 15 audited Squarespace sites and 74 audited TypeScript sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback