| Metric | Squarespace | Zone.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 32 | Zone.js |
| Accessibility | 94 | 90 | Squarespace |
| Best Practices | 94 | 90 | Squarespace |
| SEO | 92 | 88 | Squarespace |
| Security | 61 | 65 | Zone.js |
| TTFB | 125ms | 267ms | Squarespace |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Zone.js |
Squarespace outperforms Zone.js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 72). Zone.js leads in performance, security, composite score.
Choose Squarespace when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zone.js when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited Squarespace sites and 38 audited Zone.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback