Skip to content

Stay22 vs Tailwind CSS

Based on 4 and 1539 real audits

View Stay22 details | View Tailwind CSS details
MetricStay22Tailwind CSSWinner
Performance3450Tailwind CSS
Accessibility8090Tailwind CSS
Best Practices7889Tailwind CSS
SEO9092Tailwind CSS
Security6070Tailwind CSS
TTFB101ms401msStay22
Composite7076Tailwind CSS
Performance
Stay22
34
Tailwind CSS
50
Accessibility
Stay22
80
Tailwind CSS
90
Security
Stay22
60
Tailwind CSS
70
SEO
Stay22
90
Tailwind CSS
92
Composite
Stay22
70
Tailwind CSS
76

Tailwind CSS outperforms Stay22 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 70). Stay22 leads in TTFB.

When to choose Stay22

Choose Stay22 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Tailwind CSS

Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Stay22 sites and 1539 audited Tailwind CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Stay22 or Tailwind CSS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Tailwind CSS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, Stay22 or Tailwind CSS?
Tailwind CSS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Stay22 or Tailwind CSS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Tailwind CSS (90 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Stay22 or Tailwind CSS?
Tailwind CSS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Stay22 or Tailwind CSS?
Stay22 sites show lower Time to First Byte (101 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Stay22 or Tailwind CSS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Tailwind CSS scores higher on overall composite score while Stay22 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback