Based on 5 and 45 real audits
| Metric | Stencil | Usercentrics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 45 | Usercentrics |
| Accessibility | 83 | 90 | Usercentrics |
| Best Practices | 93 | 94 | Usercentrics |
| SEO | 84 | 90 | Usercentrics |
| Security | 70 | 66 | Stencil |
| TTFB | 91ms | 256ms | Stencil |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | Stencil |
Usercentrics outperforms Stencil in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 76). Stencil leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Stencil when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Usercentrics when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Stencil sites and 45 audited Usercentrics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback